Surely you have heard that our society is unsustainable, all that royo footprinting and depletion of waste that environmentalists give us pats Murga as had occasion. For the final
has proved them right and today we do not have resources enough for everyone. A clear example of this is found in fuels. Oil production has stagnated over five years, the developing countries are developing (who was going to say!) And developed countries want to do even more ...
short: there is less gasoline and diesel that we would consume .
Obviously, the problem of distribution is not a good solution .. because in one way or another someone ran out of candy
There are several forms of distribution:
1) The powerful invisible hand will fix everything.
If you leave it to the market, the system is self- in the most efficient way to reach a balance .... Unfortunately, the reality is that this invisible hand is not almighty.
To the surprise of the liberals, the high oil prices have given rise to new sources of oil. For very expensive that gasoline is not been able to increase production of gasoline still 9
As the market has failed to act on the production ... can only act on the request.
If there are 9 and 10 cars of gasoline, the price rises until one of the cars can not repay.
This is a bitch to all .... for which runs out of gas and the other 9 have to pay a heavy price. The regulation is based increase the flow of money leaving the country .... Which causes an impoverishment. The invisible hand does not save us, but we are ruined.
2) The first thing he caught for
Seeing prices soar and this causes many problems. Some leaders are tempted to solve this to the hard and prohibit by law the high prices. Place a fixed price and keep up.
But no law or prohibition may cause increased gas production. 9 remain gasoline and 10 cars. So someone runs out of it .... Petrol filling stations allocated, until exhausted.
This solution only causes shortages accompanied of a black market with high prices.
3) Discourage the use
have to consider that there are 10 people who want to take your car. It is not strange that people want to use your car when subjected to a constant barrage of advertising that is constantly reminded how much he "likes to drive," how great it is that his personal success, social status and life depend on the sexual drive and has fostered a town and a lifestyle that makes it impossible without a car.
Once you manage to convince everyone of how great it is to drive ... is no fuel for all .... and should discourage its use. You have to make it less attractive to be used less. In this sense are the measures taken by the government. Drive on the 110 km / h consumes little power and requires a little more time.
If time has a cost, as many have noted. The cost of money invested is greater than the savings produced. But there are two important differences. First time is the same for everyone. Rich and poor all have the same time, so that the measure is more equitable. On the other hand ... the extra time does not increase the flow of money leaving the country, it impoverishes us.
But reducing the velocity of circulation has a much more important. Makes it much more boring. Circular to 110km / h on a highway and a car that you would go to 180km / h is quite irritating. Makes driving less attractive which discourages the use of the car.
Everyone complains that the measure is a shit .... That means it is an effective measure. If you have to run at 110km / h is not boring and irritating enough to leave the car ... will lower the speed to 100km / h (hence the sticker is "removable"), and if you still persist in your obsession with the car will be reduced to 90, 80 km / h
So until someone decides to leave car at home and go by train.
